Bereaved families reject blanket social media bans
The under-16 social media ban has triggered intense debate in the UK. Ian Russell, Molly Russell’s father, says such a ban is wrong. Instead, he urges the government to enforce existing online safety laws. Molly Russell died aged 14 after viewing harmful online content.
An inquest later found social media played a significant role. As a result, her family continues to campaign for safer platforms. Russell argues that bans feel like political shortcuts. He warns they may create new risks for young people. Therefore, families feel frustrated by repeated debates.
Calls grow for stronger enforcement, not bans
Several charities also oppose the under-16 social media ban. These include the NSPCC, Parent Zone, and Childnet. They say bans offer a false sense of protection. According to a joint statement, risks would simply move elsewhere online. However, a targeted and evidence-based approach could work better. For example, platforms could block risky features by age.
The groups want stronger enforcement of the Online Safety Act. They also support age-appropriate experiences across platforms. In addition, they compare social media to age-rated films and games. Meanwhile, political support for a ban remains mixed. Some ministers back Australia’s recent decision.
Others prefer graded restrictions instead of total bans. Experts stress that social media can help young people. It offers connection, support, and trusted advice. As a result, regulation must protect without excluding.
