FTC Appeals Meta Antitrust Ruling, Renewing Big Tech Monopoly Debate
The Federal Trade Commission plans to appeal a court decision favoring Meta. The ruling rejected claims that Meta holds an illegal social media monopoly. However, regulators say the fight is far from over. The FTC argues Meta used unfair tactics for over a decade.
For example, it claims the company bought Instagram and WhatsApp to block competition.
As a result, the agency believes consumer choice suffered.
What the Ruling Means for Big Tech
A federal judge ruled Meta does not dominate social networking. Therefore, the company avoided a possible breakup of Instagram and WhatsApp. This decision surprised many industry watchers. In contrast, recent rulings labeled Google an illegal monopoly.
Those cases focused on search and online advertising markets. Because of this difference, the Meta case stands out. Meta welcomed the court’s decision in a public statement. The company said it faces strong competition and continues to innovate.
In addition, Meta emphasized its investments in the U.S. tech sector. The FTC’s appeal could reshape future antitrust enforcement. If successful, it may strengthen rules around Big Tech mergers.
As a result, tech companies could face tougher scrutiny.
For now, Meta continues operating as usual. Still, the appeal keeps uncertainty alive for investors and users. The outcome may influence how regulators challenge tech power worldwide.
